Every antivirus has its detection rate, scan speed, etc. We have tested antiviruses in Cyberno Lab, and the results are as follows:
|
Icon |
Antivirus name |
Detection rate |
False positive rate |
|
Scan time (s) |
|
|
|
Dr.Web |
69.2% (High) |
0% |
 |
0.04 (Fast) |
|
|
|
McAfee |
35.2% (Low) |
0% |
 |
0.32 (Normal) |
|
|
|
ClamAV |
43.7% (Low) |
0% |
|
0.84 (Slow) |
|
 |
Avast |
68.0% (High) |
0% |
|
0.03 (Fast) |
|
|
|
ESET |
69.5% (High) |
0% |
|
0.11 (Fast) |
|
|
|
F-Secure |
69.5% (High) |
0% |
|
0.38 (Normal) |
|
|
|
eScan |
64.8% (Medium) |
0% |
|
0.11 (Fast) |
|
|
|
Symantec |
53.6% (Medium) |
0% |
|
1.45 (Very slow) |
|
|
|
Padvish |
28.8% (Low) |
0% |
|
0.02 (Fast) |
|
|
|
Windows Defender |
53.2% (Medium) |
0% |
|
2.04 (Very slow) |
|
|
|
Kaspersky |
61.8% (Medium) |
0% |
|
0.06 (Fast) |
|
|
|
QuickHeal |
58.9% (Medium) |
0% |
|
0.79 (Slow) |
|
|
|
G-Data |
70.8% (High) |
0% |
|
0.16 (Fast) |
|
|
|
Comodo |
64.9% (Medium) |
0% |
|
0.08 (Fast) |
|
|
|
Yara |
Depends on the rules |
Depends on the rules |
|
0.05 (Fast) |
|
|
|
NSRL |
97.1% (High) |
86% (High false positives) |
|
0.14 (Fast) |
|
|
|
Sanitizer |
Depends on the settings |
Depends on the settings |
|
0.12 (Fast) |
|
|
|
Vulnerability Detection |
4% (Low) |
1% (Moderate false positives) |
|
0.37 (Normal) |
Knowing this information could be useful when you are using the MultiScanner.
Note: Tests have been run on a computer with 32 gigabytes of RAM and an Intel Core i7-13620H CPU, using 1000 files as the sample set. The average size of each file has been 1.7 megabytes. Among the 1000 files in the dataset, there have been 800 malware files and 200 benign files.
Note: These results are only for the Docker-based antivirus.
